dendroh.
Book a demo ↗
FRAMER PAGE 01
HOME
Copy from here to the next page marker
●
The decision layer for complex work
Turn scattered evidence intodecisions people can stand behind.
Dendroh structures the decision processes your company already uses. It gathers and checks the evidence, exposes what is missing or contested, routes material questions to the right people and preserves the complete logic behind every approval.
RECONCILE
CHALLENGE
ROUTE
RECORD
Book a demo ↗
See how it works ↓
DECISION RECORD
● SEALED
DR 00284
COUNTERPARTY ONBOARDING
Approve Northstar Payments for EMEA processing?
01 · QUESTION
Defined scope & constraints
→
02 · EVIDENCE
18 sources · 2 gaps
→
03 · POLICY
7 controls applied
→
04 · OUTCOME
Conditional approval
Human approval gate
Signed by Risk Committee · 14:32 UTC
Decision memory compounds
What if your company had preserved ten years of decision logic?
Not just what was decided, but which evidence changed the answer, which assumptions repeatedly failed, where exceptions became patterns and when human judgement improved the outcome. Over time, Dendroh turns individual decisions into institutional memory that can sharpen strategy, improve policy and make the next decision better than the last.
⌁
What changed the answer
△
Where patterns emerged
◎
Who intervened and why
↗
A better next decision
What Dendroh does
One governed decision layer beneath the way your company already works.
01
⌘
Reconcile
Bring documents, data, correspondence and prior work into one decision context.
02
◇
Challenge
Expose missing evidence, competing interpretations and unsupported conclusions.
03
↗
Route
Apply policy, decompose difficult questions and escalate to named human approvers.
04
✓
Record
Preserve the evidence, interventions, rationale and final authority in one durable account.
Built for consequential work
Control and accountability are part of the decision, not an afterthought.
Human owned outcomes
Tenant isolated data
Role based access
Encrypted in transit and at rest
Explore security and governance →
Why Dendroh
Every enterprise remembers activity.
Few remember decisions.
CRM records the relationship. Finance records the transaction. Workflow tools record that a task moved. But the reasoning layer disappears into documents, inboxes and individual memory. What evidence was used, what was missing, which options were rejected and why the final judgement was made are rarely preserved. That is the gap Dendroh fills.
From
Reconstructed logs
Evidence scattered across tools
Policies buried in prompts
Approvals detached from rationale
Outputs that cannot be replayed
To
Sealed Decision Records
Evidence with intact provenance
Policy mapped to every decision
Human gates built into the workflow
A complete, replayable lineage
FRAMER PAGE 02
PRODUCT
How Dendroh works, architecture and programme building
Scattered in. Structured out.
Dendroh reconciles the sources, finds the gaps and preserves the logic.
01 Reconcile the evidence
CONTRACT
Commercial terms
Source verified
TECHNICAL
Assessment & pricing
Source verified
OPERATIONS
Records & chronology
3 items missing
→
02 Find what matters
AI ASSISTED REVIEW
Commercial and technical positions do not reconcile.
£1.84m
COMMERCIAL
£2.31m
TECHNICAL
£470k variance · Human judgement required
→
03 Escalate & decide
DECISION RECORD · DR 00284
Escalated to Claims Committee
Evidence reconciled
Policy applied
Options presented
✓
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
Signed · 3 named reviewers
Written as work happens
What every decision keeps.
The account is created at decision time, not reconstructed months later.
▤
⌁
⚑
◇
⚖
◎
◷
✓
Architected for disagreement
What is missing matters.
What is contested matters too.
Dendroh does not treat synthesis as the end of the job. It tests which evidence entered the reasoning, which evidence was left out and where credible sources disagree before anything reaches a decision maker.
VISUAL EVIDENCE PARLIAMENT
See what the synthesis includes and omits
12 sources reviewed
08
INCLUDED
Evidence supporting the synthesis
Contract terms
Technical assessment
Operating chronology
02
CONTESTED
Evidence that does not agree
Commercial valuation
Expert interpretation
02
MISSING
Evidence required but not found
Signed variation
Authority record
01
Router
Maps each source to the questions it can answer
→
02
Critic
Tests coverage, contradiction and omission
→
03
Synthesis
Proceeds with the gaps and disputes made explicit
The Dendroh ontology
Your evidence has meaning because the relationships have meaning.
Dendroh maps the concepts your company works with, the evidence that describes them and the relationships that connect them. That domain context allows the system to reason about a decision rather than merely retrieve matching words.
ILLUSTRATIVE ONTOLOGY · DEMURRAGE
Evidence → concepts → decision
EVIDENCE
Statement of facts
Notice of readiness
Port log
Charter terms
describes
proves
governs
DOMAIN CONTEXT
Time period
contains
Waiting event
followed by
Shifting event
occurs between
Laytime clause
determines treatment of the interval
supports
contests
changes
DECISION QUESTION
Is the P3 to P5 interval countable?
Proven event
Shift and wait occurred
Contested treatment
Countable or excluded?
Human judgement required
Ontology: the company’s concepts and relationships
Evidence: the records that prove or contest them
Result: reasoning grounded in domain context
Dendroh Programme Builder
Bring your own procedure.
Build it without an engineering team.
Your experts already know how the work should run. Programme Builder turns that knowledge into an executable, governed workflow without forcing the company into somebody else’s process.
PROGRAMME
Contested claim review
Owner · Claims Assurance
Research questions
06
Approval conditions
04
Human gates
02
READY TO PUBLISH
01 · ASK
Bring your research questions
Define what the programme must resolve and the evidence each answer requires.
→
02 · DECOMPOSE
Break down when needed
Send ambiguity, missing evidence or contested claims into deeper questions.
→
03 · SYNTHESISE
Combine the findings
Reconcile answers while preserving sources, gaps and competing interpretations.
IF CONFIDENCE < 80%
Escalate for deeper analysis
IF MATERIAL JUDGEMENT
Route to a named human
04 · CONDITIONS
Set approval conditions
Apply policy, authority limits and the evidence threshold needed to proceed.
→
05 · APPROVE
Insert human judgement
Name who must review, what they see and what they are authorised to approve.
→
06 · DISPATCH
Return work to your tools
Email · CRM · Project management · Case systems · Internal APIs
Every source
Every intervention
Every rationale
One sealed Decision Record
Start with the way your company already works. Configure the questions, decomposition rules, synthesis, approval conditions, human escalation points and destination systems. Dendroh makes the logic explicit, repeatable and inspectable while your teams remain in the tools they already use.
FRAMER PAGE 03
SECURITY
Security, governance, standards and deployment
Security and governance
Security, control and accountability by design.
Dendroh is built for teams operating under audit, regulatory and internal scrutiny.
Request security documentation ↗
Contact sales
BOUNDARY PREVIEW
Mapped controls
Data boundary
Tenant scope, role model and event trail stay visible at review.
Control mapping
Map the controls and evidence requirements that apply to each programme.
Human owned decision trail
Audit ready
How we design for trust
◉
Your data never trains a model
Your content is used to answer your questions. It is never used to train or tune the models Dendroh runs on.
▣
Isolated per tenant
Every organisation’s data sits inside its own boundary, kept apart from all other customers.
⌕
Least privilege per resource
Each read and action clears a resource level permission check, so people reach only what their role grants.
▤
Every decision keeps its account
Who decided, on what evidence and why is captured while the work happens, not pieced together afterwards.
▢
Encrypted in transit and at rest
Your data is protected across storage and networks with strong, standard encryption.
◎
A person owns every outcome
AI gathers evidence and proposes. A named person approves each decision that carries weight.
Designed to support established requirements
ISO 27001
ISO 42001
SOC 2
GDPR
CCPA
EU AI Act
Deployment options
Deploy according to your environment and control requirements.
Whichever model you choose, your data stays inside its required boundary.
Customer tenant deployment
Private environment deployment
Air gapped operating model where required
FRAMER PAGE 04
USE CASES
Copy this complete section into the Use Cases page
Industries and decisions
Where missing or contested evidence changes the outcome.
01 / INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
Investment management
Evidence to investment decision ↗
02 / BANKING
Banking
Application to accountable approval ↗
03 / INSURANCE
Insurance
Assessment to assured outcome ↗
04 / LEGAL
Legal
Contested evidence to legal position ↗
05 / MARITIME & LOGISTICS
Maritime and logistics
Source record to claim decision ↗
06 / STRATEGY
Strategy and corporate development
Evidence to strategic choice ↗
07 / FINANCE & ACCOUNTING
Finance and accounting
Evidence to defensible treatment ↗
08 / RISK & OPERATIONS
Risk and operations
Exception to accountable action ↗
Illustrative case study · Demurrage
One disputed interval.
Seventeen sources. Three material gaps.
A claim can look arithmetically complete while the chronology beneath it remains unresolved. Dendroh separates what is proven, what is contested and what still needs a human decision.
01 · RECONCILE
Bring the record together
17 sources
Charter terms
Statements of fact
Port logs
Notices
Email chains
Calculations
→
02 · TEST
Event proven. Treatment not.
P3
SHIFT + WAIT
P5
03
material evidence gaps
→
03 · ESCALATE
Put the disagreement in front of the right person
Owner position
22:05 on demurrage
Charterer position
P3 to P5 excluded
Conditional position · chronology required
FRAMER PAGE 05
FAQs
Technical, value, implementation and objection handling
Questions worth asking
Before you put Dendroh
under a real decision.
Technical architecture, practical value and the objections we expect serious teams to raise.
Product & architecture
+
No. Your existing workflow remains the operating surface. Dendroh provides the governed decision layer underneath it: structuring the questions, reconciling evidence, applying policy, routing exceptions, recording approvals and preserving the logic from start to finish.
+
Dendroh works with the documents, data, email and systems already involved in the decision. Inputs can be mapped into programmes, questions and processes; approved actions can be dispatched back into the tools and communications your teams already use.
+
It models the concepts, evidence types, relationships, policies and decision gates that matter in your domain. This gives the system contextual understanding: not just finding a phrase, but understanding how a claim, clause, event, calculation and obligation relate to one another.
+
The router maps evidence to the questions it can answer. The critic then tests the proposed synthesis for coverage, contradiction and omission. Dendroh presents the result through the Evidence Parliament, where reviewers can see what was included, what remains contested and what is still missing before they approve the decision.
+
That is a core use case. Dendroh brings together structured data and unstructured material, identifies where sources agree, highlights what is missing or contested and shows exactly which conclusions depend on unresolved evidence.
+
Not where human authority is required. Dendroh does the heavy work of checking, reconciling and presenting the evidence. Companies define the escalation rules and named human approval gates. The system records who decided, what they saw and why the outcome was approved.
+
Data is isolated by tenant, encrypted in transit and at rest and accessed through resource level permissions. Customer content is used to answer the customer’s questions, not to train or tune the models Dendroh runs on. Deployment can be aligned to the organisation’s required data boundary.
Value & implementation
+
Start with one decision where evidence is fragmented, judgement is material and reconstructing the rationale is painful. A narrow wedge, such as a contested claim, an investment review or a safety incident, proves value quickly while creating a pattern that can be reused elsewhere.
+
The aim is to configure around a real workflow in weeks, not begin a multiyear transformation. Early value comes from finding gaps and conflicts sooner, reducing manual reconstruction and giving approvers a clearer, better supported decision package.
+
Dendroh reduces the cost of collecting and reconciling evidence, prevents avoidable errors from reaching approval, shortens the path through complex reviews and removes the downstream burden of rebuilding the decision from memos, inboxes and system logs.
+
Not wholesale. Dendroh maps the company’s existing programmes, questions, processes, policies and authorities. The goal is to make the current operating model explicit and governable. It does not force every team into a generic workflow designed elsewhere.
+
No. Programme Builder is designed so domain teams can configure their own research questions, decomposition rules, synthesis, escalation thresholds, approval conditions and dispatch actions. Technical teams can support integrations where needed, but they do not have to encode the company’s decision logic for every programme.
Risk & objections
+
Dendroh does not smooth over the gap or manufacture certainty. It marks what is missing, shows which conclusions are affected and routes the issue according to your escalation policy. That may mean requesting more evidence, applying a condition or moving to human judgement.
+
An audit log records that actions happened. A Decision Record preserves the meaning of the decision: the question, available evidence, missing and contested facts, policies applied, options rejected, human interventions, approval and resulting action. It is designed to be understood and replayed, not merely searched.
+
Yes. Each consequential decision receives a durable reference and a sealed record of the full lineage. Instead of reconstructing the story from emails, documents and partial logs, a reviewer can inspect the evidence and reasoning that existed at the time.
+
No. It gives them leverage. Dendroh handles the repetitive work of assembling, testing and tracing evidence so experts can focus on genuine ambiguity, contested interpretation and the judgements that require accountable human authority.
No reconstruction required
Every decision,
fully traceable.
Follow the entire journey from first source to final sign off in one durable record. Think of it as a tracking number for the decision, ready whenever the outcome is questioned.
Book a demo ↗
dendroh.
The system of record for audit defensible decisions.
© 2026 Dendroh